Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?

From: Alex Buell (alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2001 - 18:13:45 EST

Next message: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Craig Thrall: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
In reply to: Heinz Diehl: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Next in thread: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Reply: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Heinz Diehl wrote:

> > It boots, but I have some missing symbols while loading some modules.
> > The same config works fine with gcc-2.95.4
>
> gcc-2.95.4 does not exist! The latest stable release is 2.95.3.

Ah, it does exist. You have to check it out from CVS from the GCC people.
I've no doubt a release will be made soon.

-- Come the revolution, humourless gits'll be first up against the wall.

http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Craig Thrall: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
In reply to: Heinz Diehl: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Next in thread: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Reply: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:24 EST