Re: khttpd vs tux

From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (roy@karlsbakk.net)
Date: Sat Nov 03 2001 - 11:45:29 EST

Next message: bert hubert: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Previous message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux"
In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Reply: bert hubert: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> tux holds all records, khttpd has been measured to be slower than some
> userspace webservers.

What's bad about tux, then? There usually is something...

roy

--- Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: bert hubert: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Previous message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux"
In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Reply: bert hubert: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:21 EST