Re: khttpd vs tux

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Sat Nov 03 2001 - 11:28:03 EST

Next message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux"
Previous message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "khttpd vs tux"
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "khttpd vs tux"
Next in thread: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Reply: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:21:43PM +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi
>
> can someone tell me what the difference is, in functionality, speed etc.
> between the tux (2.0?) webserver and khttpd? I'm working on a project
> where all I need is raw speed - really raw speed - and I really don't know
> which to choose.

tux holds all records, khttpd has been measured to be slower than some
userspace webservers.

Regards,

bert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
Trilab                                 The Technology People
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl           - Nerd Available -
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux"
Previous message: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "khttpd vs tux"
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "khttpd vs tux"
Next in thread: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Reply: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: khttpd vs tux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:21 EST