Re: %u-order allocation failed

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Fri Oct 05 2001 - 15:22:40 EST

Next message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: Finegrained a/c/mtime was Re: Directory notification problem"
In reply to: Seth Mos: "Re: %u-order allocation failed"
Next in thread: Seth Mos: "Re: %u-order allocation failed"
Reply: Seth Mos: "Re: %u-order allocation failed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Seth Mos wrote:

> This happens using either 2.4.10-xfs or 2.4.11-pre3-xfs.

Ohh duh, IIRC there are a bunch of highmem bugs in
-linus which are fixed in -ac.

Can you reproduce the bug with an -ac kernel ?

regards,

Rik

-- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ (volunteers needed)

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: [POT] Which journalised filesystem ?"
Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: Finegrained a/c/mtime was Re: Directory notification problem"
In reply to: Seth Mos: "Re: %u-order allocation failed"
Next in thread: Seth Mos: "Re: %u-order allocation failed"
Reply: Seth Mos: "Re: %u-order allocation failed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:39 EST