Re: partition table read incorrectly

From: Wichert Akkerman (wichert@cistron.nl)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2001 - 15:00:53 EST

Next message: VDA: "Re: System reset on Kernel 2.4.10"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Previously Alan Cox wrote:
> Does it complain about wrong block sizes ?

No

> The partition code will look for tables. That bit is fine

If that bit is fine then how can it differ in opinion from fdisk?

> The exact error would be good too

I/O error: dev 08:11, sector 0

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /       Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool     \
| wichert@wiggy.net                   http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: VDA: "Re: System reset on Kernel 2.4.10"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Reply: Andreas Dilger: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:23 EST