Re: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Mon Aug 27 2001 - 16:40:40 EST


On Mon, 2001-08-27 at 17:24, Cliff Albert wrote:
> I ALWAYS run make dep && make clean && make bzImage when building a new
> kernel

OK, so that is not the problem...

> It still borks, probably you are having other options in your kernel config
> and sections you don't use may depend on dec_and_lock

No, I have places in my kernel where atomic_dec_and_lock is used. In
fact, one of the functions I was pasted where it broke was mmput() in
kernel.S (i think from fork.c). I have that function, and it uses
atomic_dec_and_lock...

So the problem is most certainly something to do with your configuration
not getting the dependency right to use atomic_dec_and_lock

Out of curiosity, what CONFIG CPU are you defined to use?
 
> First get it to work, and then spend time on keeping it current with alan's
> and linus' tree.

I am working, but it is not my code. I am merely trying to keep it in
sync with the trees. I am trying to get it working for those who it
does not compile for, but it works for me and others, so it is hard.

-- 
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:25 EST