On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/linux-2.4/
>
> Intermediate diffs are available from
> http://www.bzimage.org
>
> 2.4.8-ac12
> o Merge the majority of 2.4.9 except
> - min/max mess
> - fat/isofs changes
> - drm changes (some collisions with other
> fixes)
> - vm/buffer handling changes
> - emu10k1
> - vfs directory type changes
> - nfs/nfsd/sunrpc
> I'm trying to make sure I can keep this testable
> as 2.4.9 vanilla isnt being stable on my test sets
> This is basically a merge of all the "boring" bits.
2.4.9 is somewhat stable for me, here's where it bit me:
- init occasionally hangs on boot
- bridge (with netfilter patches from bridge.sf.net) kills NFS (I have
been told bridge and fragmented traffic don't go together well and I'd
have to change rsize/wsize to prevent fragmentation)
Is 2.4.8-ac12 "testable" or rather "stable"?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:22 EST