Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Try -ac Kernels with integrated PNPBIOS and "lspnp -v",
> > then you will see your "motherboard resources". No magic.
>
> Except on the intel boards where your machine crashes, the vaio's where
> some queries corrupt memory, the boxes where an interrupt during a pnpbios
> call crashes the box, the machines where pnpbios called from both cpus at
> the same time is a crash case, the wonderful weird tiny races on some boxes
> that use smm traps and fail if random undefined things occur between the
> two out instructions...
So call it only once early on boot (in real mode) and save the table
for later use (we don't need the fancy features ...) ?
> > Alan, 2.4 would largely benefit from PNPBIOS, do you plan
> > to submit this to LT (probably with the proposed life saver fix) ?
>
> Experience is that PnpBIOS services are so astoundingly buggy in many
> bioses that they are probably not worth the risk. Ie more boxes break by
> calling pnpbios than by assuming the vendor used a sane resource layout.
How are these bugs handled by Windows ?
Must we only mimick the Windows call layout to
enter bios-writer's well tested code path ?
> Before PnPBIOS can go mainstream we'd have to generate a detailed list
> of buggy bios signatures
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:00:50 EST