Re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho

From: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1) (erik_habbinga@hp.com)
Date: Tue Aug 14 2001 - 11:49:11 EST

Next message: kees: "Q. wipe behaves different (mem-mapped file)"
Previous message: Paulo Andre: "Problem with 2.4.9-pre3 and FAT/msdos fs"
Next in thread: Chris Mason: "re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> >reiserfs
> Would you mind rerunning your tests with ext2?
> Regards
> Henning

If I have the time and available hardware, I will try to run the following
kernels with ext2, but it might be awhile.

2.4.5pre1
2.4.7
2.4.8
2.4.9-preLatest

Erik
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: kees: "Q. wipe behaves different (mem-mapped file)"
Previous message: Paulo Andre: "Problem with 2.4.9-pre3 and FAT/msdos fs"
Next in thread: Chris Mason: "re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:53 EST