re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)

• Next message: Bruce Janson: "Re: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] CDP handler for linux"
• In reply to: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)"
• Next in thread: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday, August 13, 2001 09:40:59 AM -0700 "HABBINGA,ERIK
(HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@hp.com> wrote:

> Here are some SPEC SFS NFS testing (http://www.spec.org/osg/sfs97) results
> I've been doing over the past few weeks that shows NFS performance
> degrading since the 2.4.5pre1 kernel. I've kept the hardware constant,
> only changing the kernel.

Did the 2.4.5pre1 have the transaction tracking patch?

-chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Bruce Janson: "Re: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] CDP handler for linux"
• In reply to: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)"
• Next in thread: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:54 EST