Re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho

From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen (mailgate@hometree.net)
Date: Tue Aug 14 2001 - 02:57:25 EST

Next message: Helge Hafting: "Re: Are we going too fast?"
Previous message: Wojtek Pilorz: "Re: Lost interrupt with HPT370"
In reply to: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)"
Next in thread: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "Re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho"
Maybe reply: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "Re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@hp.com> writes:

>reiserfs

Would you mind rerunning your tests with ext2?

Regards
Henning

-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de

Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Helge Hafting: "Re: Are we going too fast?"
Previous message: Wojtek Pilorz: "Re: Lost interrupt with HPT370"
In reply to: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)"
Next in thread: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "Re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho"
Maybe reply: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1): "Re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:51 EST