On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Excellent point. We used to do all the looping and re-trying, but it got
> > ripped out a long time ago (and in any case, it historically didn't do
> > SMP, so the old code doesn't really work).
>
> Actually, funnily enough, I see that the old thread-safe stuff is still
> there in get_pte_kernel_slow(). The only thing that breaks it is that we
> don't hold any locks, so it's only UP-safe, not SMP-safe.
>
> However, it definitely looks like we should just un-inline that thing
> completely, and make a lot of it architecture-independent anyway.
Also, because lots of architectures seem to have exactly
the same code, we might as well remove the duplicates and
put them in the same place...
regards,
Rik
-- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtmlVirtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:13 EST