Re: Patch submissions

From: Kurt Garloff (garloff@suse.de)
Date: Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:26:36 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Inadequate documentation: sockets"
Previous message: Jeff Coy: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Patch submissions"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Patch submissions"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Patch submissions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:22:58PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I agree with Alan that we should keep all experimental stuff
> out of 2.4,

Depends on the impact. Experimental stuff in MM, FS, ... things is something
which we don't want. If somebody writes a new driver for a device which was
not supported before, we may want to add it to the kernel to get it tested
and improved.
But, that's probably what you meant.

> probably even out of linux-kernel ...

No. I want to see experimental stuff on l-k. That's what it's meant for.

Regards,

-- Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> Eindhoven, NL GPG key: See mail header, key servers Linux kernel development SuSE GmbH, Nuernberg, FRG SCSI, Security

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Inadequate documentation: sockets"
Previous message: Jeff Coy: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Patch submissions"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Patch submissions"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Patch submissions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 07 2001 - 21:00:20 EST