On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > I'm really interested in things which make Linux 2.4 break
> > performance-wise since I'd like to have them fixed before the
> > distributions start shipping 2.4 as default.
>
> With kernel 2.4.1, I found that caching is way too aggressive. I
> was running konqueror in 32Mb (the quest for a lightwieght
> browser!) Unfortunately, the system seemed to insist on keeping
> 16Mb used for caches, with 15Mb given to the application and X.
Wrong.
Cache and processes are INCLUSIVE. Konquerer and your other
applications will share a lot of memory with the cache. More
precisely, everything which is backed by a file or has been
swapped out once (and swapped back in later) will SHARE memory
with both cache and processes.
In 2.4.1-pre<something> the kernel swaps out cache 32 times more
agressively than it scans pages in processes. Until we find a way
to auto-balance these things, expect them to be wrong for at least
some workloads ;(
regards,
Rik
-- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 23 2001 - 21:00:30 EST