On Sunday 18 February 2001 18:22, Denis Perchine wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as fas as I can see from fdatasync man page, and from the latest kernel
> sources (2.4.1ac3, fs/buffer.c), they are equivalent.
>
> Using of fdatasync in database can gain significant gain on systems which
> supports it (on HP it gains up to 25% with pg_bench on PostgreSQL 7.1b5).
>
> Are there any plans to implement this correctly? And due to what problems
> it was not implemented yet?
Forget this crap. Seems I missed these lines:
err = file->f_op->fsync(file, dentry, 0);
err = file->f_op->fsync(file, dentry, 1);
-- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine---------------------------------- E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/ FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5 ---------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 23 2001 - 21:00:17 EST