Somewhat different GPL Question

From: Christopher Friesen (cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com)
Date: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 12:56:23 EST

Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: Big file support in Linux 2.2"
Previous message: Tim Riker: "Re: [PATCH] cpu detection fixes for test10-pre4"
In reply to: Matthew Dharm: "Re: GPL Question"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Somewhat different GPL Question"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Somewhat different GPL Question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

If I use some GPL'd code and make calls from my software to the GPL'd
code, do I need to make *my* code available? Or would I only have to
make available any changes to the GPL'd code?

Section 2.b of the GPL seems to indicate that I need to make the source
for my entire executable available if it incorporates any GPL'd source,
and that I cannot charge for the software, only for its distribution.
Is this correct?

Thanks,
Chris

-- 
Chris Friesen                    | MailStop: 043/33/F10  
Nortel Networks                  | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue              | fax:  (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada        | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: Big file support in Linux 2.2"
Previous message: Tim Riker: "Re: [PATCH] cpu detection fixes for test10-pre4"
In reply to: Matthew Dharm: "Re: GPL Question"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Somewhat different GPL Question"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Somewhat different GPL Question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:22 EST