Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

• Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: An excellent read on CPU caches"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules"
• In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules"
• Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules"
• Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rik van Riel wrote:
> If C++ really is that good for kernel modules, I'd like to
> see some code that proves it can be done without too much
> of a performance hit (or without a performance hit at all?).
>

it can be done in theory :)

> Sending 500 rants to the kernel list isn't even close to
> being productive. Sending 1 patch is...
>

i already made that point. the only proof that it can
be done is the demonstration of an actual kernel module
without a grave performance hit.

many thanks!

> regards,

-- 
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: An excellent read on CPU caches"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules"
• In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules"
• Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules"
• Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST