On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 04:26:38PM +0100, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial
> > compiler, with all the consequences I said.
>
> And didnt you write something called pgcc once.
Oh yes, of course while providing full binary compatibility. You can
even mix & match objects from gcc and pgcc and agcc, no kidding. No
distribution that used pgcc was ever binary incompatible to any other
distribution, which is the point you keep ignoring.
> *PLONK*
No need to get personal ;) I had hoped you could keep to *technical*
reasoning, though :(
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@opengroup.org |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:27 EST