> Oh, I understand why #2 is necessary, that doesn't mean that I don't hear
> people complain about it anyway. On a side note, I consider lack of a real
> kernel debugger to be evidence for #1. But I don't want to kick that dead
> horse again.
Well, I'm one of those guys who never uses debuggers :)
> > I'd be a bit more careful. It is in large part those "completely
> > ridiculous, nobody will ever be able to write decent software that way"
> > whims that got Linux to where it stands today.
>
> Very true!
Regards,
Igmar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:22 EST