Re: the new VMt

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@linuxcare.com.au)
Date: Wed Sep 27 2000 - 02:14:12 EST


In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.10009250931570.1739-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> you
 write:
> I suspect that the proper way to do this is to just make another gfp_flag,
> which is basically another hint to the mm layer that we're doing a multi-
> page allocation and that the MM layer should not try forever to handle it.
>
> In fact, that's independent of whether it is a multi-page allocation or
> not. It might be something like __GFP_SOFT - you could use it with single
> pages too.

That'd be a lovely interface, now wouldn't it?

*yecch*

Please consider at least:

/* Never fails. */
#define trivial_kmalloc(s) \
         ((void)((s) > PAGE_SIZE ? bad_size_##s : __kmalloc((s), GFP_KERNEL)))

/* Can fail */
#define kmalloc(s, pri) __kmalloc((s), (pri)|__GFP_SOFT)

Rusty.

--
Hacking time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:19 EST