Hi,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:02:30AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 09:27:39PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > So help testing the patches to them. Arrgh...
>
> I think I'd better fix the bugs that I know about before testing patches that
> tries to remove the superblock_lock at this stage.
Right. If we're introducing new deadlock possibilities, then sure we
can fix the obvious cases in ext2, but it will be next to impossible
to do a thorough audit of all of the other filesystems. Adding in the
new shrink_icache loop into the VFS just feels too dangerous right
now.
Of course, that doesn't mean we shouldn't remove the excessive
superblock locking from ext2 --- rather, it is simply more robust to
keep the two issues separate.
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:00:14 EST