(reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 13:09:05 EST


> That problem: the original elevator code did not schedule I/O particularly
> fairly under certain I/O usage patterns. So it got fixed.

No it got hacked up a bit.

> Now, I see people trying to introduce the concept of elapsed time into
> that fix, which smells strongly of hack. How will this hack be cobbled

Actually my brain says that elapsed time based scheduling is the right thing
to do. It certainly works for networks

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST