I stand corrected, thank you sir. According to the FTp archive at tux.org,
2.3.99-pre1 appeared on Wed. March 15, 2000. It's right next to 2.3.9,
which dates to 1999, so I imagine it was simple reading error on my part.
My apologies. It's been in "freeze" for four months, not eleven or
twelve.
-Michael
You said...
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:13:53PM -0400, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> > freeze," despite being in "2.4.0-test-X" stage for months, and
> > "2.3.99-pre-X" for nearly a year.
>
> you keep repeating this misinformation, so I think it's worth correcting
> you.
>
> 2.3.99pre1 : Tue Mar 14
> 2.4.0-test1: Thu May 25
>
> (and Linus promptly went on holiday, so it may be more fair to start
> counting 2.4.0-test from 2.4.0-test2: Fri Jun 23).
>
> On Monday August 9th, 1999 -- one year ago today -- Linus released
> 2.3.13. that's a lot of revisions from .51 which was the final 2.3
> before 2.3.99-pre.
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST