Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux.

• Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "[question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()?"
• Previous message: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave."
• In reply to: Venkata Rajesh Velamakanni: "Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux."
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux."
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 03:03:37PM +0530, Venkata Rajesh Velamakanni wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am closing the fd in the same process ( in the other thread ).
> Though I close the socket, on which recvfrom is blocking,
> still recvfrom is hanging ( infact recvfrom is blocking on a
> invalid socket as I have closed the socket).
>
> I could not understand your sentence "Vendor kernel bug reports
> should go to the vendors, linux-kernel is for official kernel releases.
> It most likely doesn't have the bugfixes though." Could you please
> elaborate.

2.2.12-something is a patched redhat kernel with unofficial patches. Any
bug reports about that should go to RH, not to linux-kernel.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "[question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()?"
• Previous message: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave."
• In reply to: Venkata Rajesh Velamakanni: "Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux."
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux."
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:08 EST