Re: It's time to get rid of zImage

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Wed Jun 14 2000 - 13:24:26 EST


"James H. Cloos Jr." wrote:
>
> >>>>> "hpa" == H Peter Anvin <hpa@transmeta.com> writes:
>
> hpa> ---> It's time to get rid of zImage once and for all. <---
>
> Cool. But so would be getting rid of bzImage in the general case.
> Using a two-stage loader (unless it can be done in 1) to boot a
> vmlinux.gz file from a filesystem would be way cool.
>
> Just like on (pretty much all of?) the other architectures.
>
> Yes?
>

I have been working on that... however, that's a much bigger step, and I
don't think it's time for that yet.

vmlinux (.gz) in the current form would not be appropriate for booting
on i386 though. The kernel needs a "setup" that runs in 16-bit real
mode.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:32 EST