Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying

From: Jan-Simon Pendry (JS.Pendry@msdw.com)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2000 - 02:39:55 EST


Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > question. Why should the linux kernel wait for all the other file systems
> > to implement any journeled fs. While this would make great business
>
> The other file systems do implement journalling
>
> > never happen though. By the time ext3, xfs, etc get to the level that
>
> They are already at that level or close to it
>
> If they werent life would (paradoxically) be a lot simpler

it seems to me that one great advantage to linux (and open source in general)
has been the willingness to roll stuff out when it's just about ready for use,
but before it has been polished to dust. that comes later.

many times on l-k, you see "flames" of the form ``don't tell us what to
do, just show us your fix''. for some reason, this particular area
(journalling) seems be going in the opposite direction. there's a lot
of telling people what to do, (``come up with a common journalling design'')
rather than showing us the fix (``here's some code that implements a common
journalling layer'').

confused ...

jan-simon.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:24 EST