Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Jun 05 2000 - 09:48:07 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying"
Previous message: David Luyer: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
In reply to: Hubert Mantel: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
Next in thread: Stephen Frost: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If my oracle database lives on a software RAID, I cannot even update to
> 2.2.16 with some distributions.

Vendor patches are a whole other kettle of fish. Raid 0.90 was pretty
comprehensively vetoed as an update to the mainstream kernel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying"
Previous message: David Luyer: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
In reply to: Hubert Mantel: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
Next in thread: Stephen Frost: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:21 EST