Re: netperf & transmit path performance

From: Kallol Biswas (kallol@bugula.fpk.hp.com)
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 14:41:44 EST

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Slow development cycle"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: Slow development cycle"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: netperf & transmit path performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

There was no switch/hub between two systems. There might be
some collisions but the card did not report it when counters were dumped
or some other problem.

>
> On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 02:06:42PM -0400, Kallol Biswas wrote:
> > Thank you for your reply, but I displayed all the counters after
> > running netperf. There were no collisions, no error, no
> > discarded frame.
>
> No collisions on half duplex bulk transfer sounds bogus. I would suspect
> incorrect switch settings or similar.
>
>
> -Andi
>

-- Phone: 973-443-7469 Telnet: 1-443-7469 www.kallolbiswas.com kallol_biswas@hp.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Slow development cycle"
Previous message: James Sutherland: "Re: Slow development cycle"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: netperf & transmit path performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:28 EST