Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?

From: Chris Wedgwood (cw@f00f.org)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 16:02:40 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: elevator.c warnings?"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
In reply to: Khimenko Victor: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Reply: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 01:46:01PM +0400, Khimenko Victor wrote:

    So it's not just me. Is it known issue ? Even if locking on unix
    sockets is not supported (why?) kernel oops and segmentation
    fault does not look like right rection to me :-/

Open should fail on unix sockets. Does this fix your problem?

--cw

text/plain attachment: 2.4.0t1ac5-open-sock-fix.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: elevator.c warnings?"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
In reply to: Khimenko Victor: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Reply: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST