Re: iptables v1.1.0 w/2.3.99-pre9

From: Jim Baxter (jim@atconnex.net)
Date: Mon May 29 2000 - 11:26:10 EST


James.,

I'm using Slackware v4.0 which is based on libc not glibc.. Perhaps that's
the problem.. <SHRUG>. Thanks for the suggestion of the netfilter list.
I'll go give that a shot as well.

Jim
jim@atconnex.net

----- Original Message -----
From: James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>
To: Jim Baxter <jim@atconnex.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu>
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: iptables v1.1.0 w/2.3.99-pre9

> On Fri, 26 May 2000, Jim Baxter wrote:
>
> > After going throuh the painstaking process of compiling 2.3.99-pre9 on
my
> > 486/33 last night, I have to say I'm very happy with the multilink ppp
> > support it now has! Because this box is infact a nat in my home, i
compiled
> > support for iptables and then today read the iptables howto. I'm having
> > great difficult making iptables with this kernel. Here's the output:
> >
> > -- <snip> --
> > themask:/usr/src/iptables-1.1.0# make
> > Making dependencies: please wait...
> >
cc -O2 -Wall -Wunused -Iinclude/ -I/usr/src/linux/include -DNDEBUG -DNETFILT
> > ER_VERSION=\"1.1.0\" -fPIC -o extensions/libipt_tcp_sh.o -c
> > extensions/libipt_tcp.c
> > In file included from
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:25,
> > from include/libiptc/libiptc.h:6,
> > from include/iptables.h:5,
> > from extensions/libipt_tcp.c:7:
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h:53: `INT_MIN' undeclared
here
> > (not in a function)
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h:53: enumerator value for
> > `NF_IP_PRI_FIRST' not integer constant
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h:59: `INT_MAX' undeclared
here
> > (not in a function)
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h:59: enumerator value for
> > `NF_IP_PRI_LAST' not integer constant
> > make: *** [extensions/libipt_tcp_sh.o] Error 1
> > -- <snip> --
> >
> > any thoughts?
> >
>
> This kind of thing in the past has been caused by differences in glibc
> headers over different versions of glibc, but my usual test of booting
> into RH5.x for this hasn't picked it up.
>
> What distro & version are you using, and what version of glibc does it
> have? (if it's rpm based, do rpm -q glibc).
>
> Also, it may be an idea to discuss this on the netfilter list (see
> http://lists.samba.org/)
>
> - James
> --
> James Morris
> <jmorris@intercode.com.au>
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:21 EST