Basic testing shows 2.3.99-pre9-3 bad, pre9-2 good

From: Lawrence Manning (lawrence@aslak.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 12:44:16 EST


That's my observation anyway. I did some dd and bonnie tests and got
abismal results :-( Machine unusable during dd write etc. pre9-2 on the
other hand is close to being as smooth as, say, 2.3.51. What happened? ;)

P2 400Mhz, 128meg, IDE (dma turned on) etc, etc.

I also should chip in to say that 2.2.15 is abit sick IO wise for me too.

Lawrence

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:20 EST