Re: [OT] util-linux-2.10g and Windows 2000

From: Daniel.Egger@suse.de
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 13:52:25 EST


On 22 Feb, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:

> It is rumoured that Windows 2000 does not accept partition
> tables that are not ordered according to disk order.
> (DOS / Win95 / Win98 have no problems, and neither has Linux)
> If this is true then fdisk must become somewhat stricter.
> The present version has an expert command f that does a sort.
> [But, let me repeat, nobody tried this. However, it compiles.]
 
> If anyone happens to have a Windows 2000 system nearby,
> I would be interested in hearing about what it thinks
> about unsorted (or otherwise less usual) partition tables,
> both during an install and during normal operation.

 Well, I shot up W2K. I do not know however whether adding
 the partitions did this or some LILO magic. Should reordering
 help to let boot again? Not that I wanted to.... :/

-- 

Servus, Daniel

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:31 EST