Re: new or old devfs naming scheme (Was: Re: devfs howto)

From: Sergey Kubushin (ksi@ksi-linux.com)
Date: Mon Feb 21 2000 - 03:35:53 EST


On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:

> James W. Laferriere writes:
> >
> > Hello Richard, I have to agree with Sergey on the point
> > of liking the old names over the new . But I guess I can
> > get devfsd to create them for me can't I ? Tia, JimL
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Sergey Kubushin wrote:
> > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > ...snip...
> > > >
> > > > Having "partX" in the partition table scan may make it too long. The
> > > > reason the devfs names are not "pX" is because Linus wanted a longer
> > > > name. I'd be quite happy to shorten them.
> > >
> > > Just my $.25 - I liked the old devfs names (that of /dev/sda/c0b0t0u0p1)
> > > much more than /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 ...
>
> Yes, you can. But maybe someone could ask Linus if they could be
> changed...

I do suspect that Linus happen to read the list sometimes... Or may be we
have to start a petition like that in LVM to convice him ? :))

===========================================================================
Sergey Kubushin aka the Tamer < > The impossible we do immediately.
e-mail: ksi@ksi-linux.com SK320-RIPE < > Miracles require 24-hour notice.
===========================================================================

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:27 EST