Re: Proposed SyncPPP layer modifications

From: Linux Lists (lists@cyclades.com)
Date: Fri Feb 18 2000 - 17:07:22 EST


On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Gergely Madarasz wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
>
> > Proposal 2: implement the common device allocation & registration code
> > similar to the init_etherdev() and ether_setup() routines.
>
> The problem I see with this: only syncppp and hdlc protocols can be used
> on those devices this way. The comx drivers support lapb thru the lapb
> stack, and they have a minimal frame relay support too. This would mean
> that different protocols need different initialization stuff, etc... which
> would make quite a mess, unless all the possible sync serial protocols are
> integrated into the syncppp driver... So I don't think this is a good
> idea.

Agreed. The Cyclades-PC300 driver also supports X.25 (through the Linux
implementation) and will support Frame Relay. So, unless all these
protocols are integrated into a single file, _or_ all of them have a
common interface to which they refer to, this is not a good idea.

Regards,
Ivan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 21:00:22 EST