Re: 2.2.15pre5: still very unstable

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Thu Feb 03 2000 - 13:09:25 EST

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: IDE IRQ Timeout under NWFS while doing direct I/O to 2.0/2.2/2.3]]"
Previous message: Roberto Diaz: "Re: mimio digital meeting assistant"
In reply to: Igor Mozetic: "2.2.15pre5: still very unstable"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: 2.2.15pre5: still very unstable"
Reply: Manfred Spraul: "Re: 2.2.15pre5: still very unstable"
Reply: Chip Salzenberg: "Re: 2.2.15pre5: still very unstable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Igor Mozetic wrote:

>2.2.15pre5 keeps freezing when memory is near exhaustion.

Try again with 2.2.14aa6 (with my alternate approch to the two
atomic-allocation-failed and GFP-called-in-non-runnable-state problems):

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: IDE IRQ Timeout under NWFS while doing direct I/O to 2.0/2.2/2.3]]"
Previous message: Roberto Diaz: "Re: mimio digital meeting assistant"
In reply to: Igor Mozetic: "2.2.15pre5: still very unstable"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: 2.2.15pre5: still very unstable"
Reply: Manfred Spraul: "Re: 2.2.15pre5: still very unstable"
Reply: Chip Salzenberg: "Re: 2.2.15pre5: still very unstable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST