Re: [PATCH] shm fs v2 against 2.3.41

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@goop.org)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2000 - 21:53:57 EST


On 02-Feb-00 Jamie Lokier wrote:
> If the VFS were going to be changed so radically, I'd much rather "//"
> were reserved for something useful like URLs

Since URLs don't really form a useful namespace, it seems like a bit of a
waste. On the other hand, // seems like a both nasty and unnecessary namespace
trick anyway.

If you want to graft things into the namespace, what's wrong with mount?

        J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 07 2000 - 21:00:07 EST