> > Since when has "kmalloc" been a standard name anyway ?
>
> Why do we have printk anyway? It serves the same purpose as printf and
> is even tagged as `taking arguments like printf' for gcc's type-checking
> benefit.
It is actually subtly different (the <N> priority thing) which I always
thought was the reason why printk() is not called printf(). It is not
called cmn_err() because of different semantics, so it would cause more
headache than usefullness. So, if it can't be printf() and cmn_err() -
what is there left as a possible name? printk(), of course :)
Sorry if I sound like a depressed human - I planned to try 2 new ideas
wrt pollfd allocation this weekend and instead I am faced with a sudden
requirement to fill in TWO YEARS worth of tax return forms so I am :(
Regards,
Tigran.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:28 EST