Re: kernel panics at google

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 19:51:54 EST


> us). We guarantees that tp->retrans_head is still pointing to a
> valid packet so right now I cant see a cause.
>
> Correct. There are several checks for NULL, anything which
> fixes it up points it at the head of the write_queue which
> by definition is not empty.
>
> All of this code is protected by asynchronous behavior either
> by virtue of running in BH or from the user within' BH atomic
> backlog processing.
>
> As in many cases, we still have the ugly "kfree_skb() runs
> destructor in hardware IRQ context" stuff which can mess
> with socket state. I've been over these paths several
> times and they absoultely cannot mess with the socket
> write queue, or retrans_head/send_head in any way.

Well someone appears to have unlinked the buffer on the queue. I guess
the first thing to do is to print the other fields of skb, Notably print
skb->prev and skb->list

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 23 2000 - 21:00:24 EST