Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);

From: Manfred Spraul (manfreds@colorfullife.com)
Date: Wed Jan 12 2000 - 13:02:44 EST

Next message: Sam Gendler: "wireless LAN question [off topic, maybe?]"
Previous message: Leeuw van der, Tim: "RE: Unresolved Symbols in PCMCIA modules"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Reply: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Also, the image size is greater if CONFIG_KMOD is not defined but it is
> much smaller when it is defined. Remember all the snippets of code with
> char name[32]; sprintf(name...) all over the place? Now they are all
> compactified into one piece inside request_module().
>

request_module_fn() is a great idea, but I would change _that_ function
call to an empty define if CONFIG_KMOD is not set.

Sorry for the confusion.

-- Manfred

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sam Gendler: "wireless LAN question [off topic, maybe?]"
Previous message: Leeuw van der, Tim: "RE: Unresolved Symbols in PCMCIA modules"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Reply: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST