In article <20000110145913.01335@colin.muc.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:
>
>I planed to map the Unix Sockets abstract name space to a file system
>for some time now. Because it would be silly to write another file
>system just for that rather obscure feature, would it be possible
>to use a subdirectory in your new shm filesystem?
I'd much rather _not_ do it like that.
Remembe: do one thing, and do it well. Mixing up seveal conceptually
unrelated things just ends up a maintenance nightmare, and implies tying
the two together more than necessary.
What if somebody wants shared memory but not UNIX domain sockets? Or
vice versa? Issues like that add extra and unnecessary complexity if you
want to tie the functionality together.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST