Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?

From: Gregory McLean (gregm@comstar.net)
Date: Wed Jan 05 2000 - 19:34:02 EST


-> Also sprach Dominik Kubla:
-> } On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 03:32:53PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
[snip]
-> } Incidentally this is the exact argument that reportedly was used against
-> } those who warned about the Y2K problen in late seventies/early eighties!
-> }
-> There's certainly a correlation (sp?) between the two and it would be
-> ironic if it happened again. However, here's why I think it won't:
->
-> Noone uses old machines for very long. How many of you are still using a
-> PDP-10 (30+ years ago) or an Apple classic (20- years ago) for "real"
-> work?

Umm.. Actually, I was at a satellite uplink station and saw a _pair_ of
pdp-10's. I asked those aren't still being used and the answer was, yes,
they are. They are doing some sort of encryption/decrytion/signal
processing.
So you never know from what corner this old gear will pop up in.

-- 
Gregory McLean     | What I do is called 'fishing', if it were any easier
comstar.net inc.   |it would be called 'catching' and there would be more
programmer/analyst |people doing it. 
770 485-6016       |
----------------This is my opinion, All MINE! I tell you------------------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 07 2000 - 21:00:05 EST