The subject of distributed filesystems is a different matter. I don't
know the state they are for 2.3 kernel inclusion.
Pedro
On 5 Jan 00, at 8:41, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> From: "Pedro M. Rodrigues" <pmanuel@myrealbox.com>
> Subject: Re: First draft list of 2.3.x "Things to fix"
> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:52:54 -0000
>
> >
> > I agree. Even though i do have a need for LVM in my servers (they
> > look kinda ugly next to those AIX machines) i felt awkward when i
> > knew about the petition. Don't ask me why, but i feel that a lot of
> > people asking for the same thing doesn't mean it's the right thing to
> > do.
>
> Also, how does this relate to similar features in CODA, DFS and AFS (Arla)?
> It's usefull, but is it the _only_ way to go about doing things?
> Should we have some generic/unified approach to this?
>
> I know I need this, but it doesn't mean that I want diffrent come in and do
> ad-hoc patches to make their stuff work, I'd rather see some joint effort for
> a generic interface so that future additions become less messy to do.
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 07 2000 - 21:00:03 EST