Re: [PATCH v3.5 17/19] mwifiex: slight optimization of addr compare

[Ding Tianhong]

On 2014/1/8 10:50, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi Ding,
> 
>> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
>> instead of memcmp.
> 
>> @@ -782,8 +782,7 @@ static int mwifiex_ret_ibss_coalescing_status(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
>>  	}
>>
>>  	/* If BSSID is diff, modify current BSS parameters */
>> -	if (memcmp(priv->curr_bss_params.bss_descriptor.mac_address,
>> -		   ibss_coal_resp->bssid, ETH_ALEN)) {
>> +	if (!ether_addr_equal(priv->curr_bss_params.bss_descriptor.mac_address, ibss_coal_resp->bssid))
> 
> Could you break the line?
> If you run "checkpatch.pl" you will spot this warning.
> 
>>  	if (!IS_11N_ENABLED(priv) ||
>> -	    memcmp(priv->curr_addr, rx_pkt_hdr->eth803_hdr.h_dest, ETH_ALEN)) {
>> +	    !ether_addr_equal_unaligned(priv->curr_addr, rx_pkt_hdr->eth803_hdr.h_dest)) {
> 
> Also over 80 characters here.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bing
> 

Ok, thanks

Regards
Ding

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/