Re: [GIT] kbuild fixes

[Floris Kraak]

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Sam Ravnborg<sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> - disabling of -Wformat-security
> ÂWe looked at it and 'fixing' the warnings was not pleasant

The alternative is roughly 136 'trivial' patches to shut them all up*
and one to turn this flag on unconditionally to prevent hackers from
adding more of them after that ;-)

The alternative to *that* is improving on this silly flag:
- Either finding some way to teach GCC how to not emit warnings about
usage that is entirely sane.
- Or finding some way to teach some other build tool to catch unsafe
usage without polluting the build with false positives.

Take your pick.

*) While I can't give you 100% certainty about every warning I know
for a fact the vast majority of the warnings at least consists of
false positives so there'd be no other benefit from them except a
quieter kernel build on certain distro's ;-)

Regards,
Floris
---
'Or lawyers may say, âBut if I decline, someone else will do it. So
what is gained?â My reply: âLet someone else do it. But not you. Honor
is personal. Worry about yourself.  You donât get a pass from moral
responsibility because you acted for a client.â

Thatâs the first lesson I would offer, aimed at lawyers. A second
lesson, aimed at all, is this: Keep ready your capacity for outrage.
This is very important. Next to the vote, outrage is the one response
each of us can contribute. Outrage is how honor must confront
dishonor. If we lose the capacity for outrage, we are in serious
trouble. '
   --- Stephen Gillers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/