Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] timers: framework for migration between CPU

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:45 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Yes - but that kind of policy should be coupled and expressed 
> > via cpusets. /proc based irq_affinity is just a limited, 
> > inflexible hack. All things IRQ partitioning should be handled 
> > via cpusets - perhaps via the 'system sets' idea from Peter?
> 
> all we got out of that idea was the default_smp_affinity thing 
> in /proc/irq and a head-ache trying to work out silly details.
> 
> Maybe we ought to try again,..

Your system sets patch was actually very sane, it just fell 
victim to a merge window i think. Mind re-sending it?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/