Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] timers: framework for migration between CPU

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:45 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Yes - but that kind of policy should be coupled and expressed 
> via cpusets. /proc based irq_affinity is just a limited, 
> inflexible hack. All things IRQ partitioning should be handled 
> via cpusets - perhaps via the 'system sets' idea from Peter?

all we got out of that idea was the default_smp_affinity thing
in /proc/irq and a head-ache trying to work out silly details.

Maybe we ought to try again,..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/