Re: [2.2.13] Are ulimits respected at all?!

Bernd Eckenfels (ecki@lina.inka.de)
Fri, 31 Dec 1999 12:32:12 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Abramo Bagnara: "PATCH: was Re: mmap bug in 2.2.13 (or in documentation)"
Previous message: Homme R. Bitter: "Re: Unexecutable Stack / Buffer Overflow Exploits..."
Maybe in reply to: Lord Praetor Satanus of Acheron: "[2.2.13] Are ulimits respected at all?!"

In article <MailDrop1.2d7j-PPC.991231205022@acheron.paypc.com> you wrote:
> I ALWAYS get success! I know ulimit -c works, so does the max user process
> limit. But memory doesn't seem to obey the ulimits, hard or soft.

You should write not-null blocks, since null pages are not allocated.

Greetings
Bernd

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Abramo Bagnara: "PATCH: was Re: mmap bug in 2.2.13 (or in documentation)"
Previous message: Homme R. Bitter: "Re: Unexecutable Stack / Buffer Overflow Exploits..."
Maybe in reply to: Lord Praetor Satanus of Acheron: "[2.2.13] Are ulimits respected at all?!"