Re: spin_unlock optimization

Oliver Henning (oliver@henning.com)
Thu, 30 Dec 1999 04:06:04 +0100


Hi Gabor,

well, not necessarily. If you would modify the spin_unlock asm sequence at
boot time, there would be no performance loss. But self-modifying code is
not very desirable, so...

Greetz,
Oliver

>
> Yes. Runtime option is not acceptable imho. movb $0,%0 can be fast but if
> you need a conditional instruction to test if the fast version can be used
> uses more and more cycles.
>
> --
> ---[ LGB/DC ]------------[ University Of Veszprém ]------[ Lénárt
Gábor ]---
> "The truth is out there" "We're l{ea,i}ving together" "The future is
dark."
> ---[ 30/2270823 ]--------[ http://lgb.hal.vein.hu ]---------[ 87/477074 ]

---
>  finger lgb@hal2000.hal.vein.hu for more  !LINUX!  SMS :
lgblgb@westel900.net

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/