Re: [rfc] __SMP__ vs. CONFIG_SMP

Rusty Russell (rusty@linuxcare.com.au)
Mon, 27 Dec 1999 12:45:30 +1100

In message <199912260312.VAA23979@duracef.shout.net> you write:
> But if you want to write up a partial patch (like arch/i386 and
> include/i386) and submit it to Linus and get his opinion, go for it.

Note that Linus doesn't eat such patches easily. I submitted a
s/__SMP__/CONFIG_SMP/ patch some months ago and it went nowhere.

CONFIG_SMP everywhere: easier for external module compilation...

Rusty.

--
Hacking time.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/