* Rene Rebe said:
> > > Erm, no, I got the impression most were trying to not have the kernel
> > > encompass all of user space... There are lots of things that are ver=
y good
> > > at being modular. This doesn't mean they need to be in the kernel. =
Would
> > > you want bash in the kernel?
> > Of course no, but there are some things that benefit from being put in =
the
> > kernel - especially daemons serving huge files - nfsd and httpd for exa=
mple.
>=20
> Why not putting !ALL! into Linux Kernel?? From X over Gnome to XEmacs
> and gcc?? Imagine the performace and stability benefit! ;-)
You aren't being rational right now. Read what I said and think about it for
a while.=20
=20
> I'd like to see a (not my!!) Linux box crashing by i.e. loading a
> currupted font! ;-) (Like NT's do!!)
>=20
> That is what u like??
No. Read what others write a bit more carefully and give the issue a bit
thought before you start writing yourself.
=20
Merry X-Mas and Happy New Year to all of you people :)
marek
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEAREBAAYFAjhjf3MACgkQq3909GIf5urSWQCfQ8sSFnW98j056zdF/iByvQod
SfkAn33AEU2MVM88H8r4X584O5qViie6
=+Nn9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/